“I’m going to leave that to others to conclude.” Uhm, excuse me. What was that?

I’m sure by now everybody has heard about Clintons inability to give a straight answer. For those who haven’t: In an ABC Interview she was asked if she agreed that homosexuality is immoral. Her answer:

“Well I’m going to leave that to others to conclude. I’m very proud of the gays and lesbians I know who perform work that is essential to our country, who want to serve their country and I want make sure they can.”

Why the hell couldn’t she just say: “No, I don’t think so.”? See? It’s really easy. I’ve got to admit that I don’t really understand the American obsession with this topic. Most Germans don’t give a crap about other peoples sexuality (unless, of course, they want to be involved in it). But back to the point: Why do I get the impression that Senator Clinton is a PollBot - always cagey and evasive when it comes to controversial issues, but seemingly straightforward when it’s clear that it won’t effect the polls.

The more often I hear and see her, the more artificial she seems to be. But maybe that’s just my impression, and in the end she proves me wrong. I’d be glad.

Powered by Gregarious (42) Share This

Popularity: 3% [?]

RSS feed | Trackback URI


No comments yet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.